2000 Kia Avella vs. 1963 Lancia Fulvia
To start off, 2000 Kia Avella is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 1,322 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Kia Avella is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lancia Fulvia (90 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2000 Kia Avella. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lancia Fulvia should accelerate faster than 2000 Kia Avella. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lancia Fulvia weights approximately 55 kg more than 2000 Kia Avella. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Kia Avella (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Lancia Fulvia. (116 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2000 Kia Avella will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Lancia Fulvia.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Kia Avella | 1963 Lancia Fulvia | |
Make | Kia | Lancia |
Model | Avella | Fulvia |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1322 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2340 mm |