2000 Kia Avella vs. 1966 Mini MK I
To start off, 2000 Kia Avella is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,322 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Kia Avella is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Kia Avella (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1966 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Kia Avella should accelerate faster than 1966 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Kia Avella weights approximately 300 kg more than 1966 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Kia Avella (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mini MK I. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2000 Kia Avella will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Kia Avella | 1966 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Kia | Mini |
| Model | Avella | MK I |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1322 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 61 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2040 mm |
