2000 Kia Avella vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Kia Avella is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Renault Clio (80 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2000 Kia Avella. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2000 Kia Avella. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Kia Avella weights approximately 65 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Kia Avella (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (107 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Kia Avella will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Kia Avella | 1991 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Kia | Renault |
| Model | Avella | Clio |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1322 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 80 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 107 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2470 mm |
