2000 Kia Avella vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2000 Kia Avella is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2000 Kia Avella. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2000 Kia Avella. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 585 kg more than 2000 Kia Avella. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK (190 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Kia Avella. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Kia Avella.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Kia Avella | 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Kia | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Avella | CLK |
Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1322 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2670 mm |