2000 Kia Avella vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Kia Avella. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Kia Avella would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 2000 Kia Avella. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2000 Kia Avella. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 615 kg more than 2000 Kia Avella. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Clio (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Kia Avella. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Kia Avella.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Kia Avella | 2003 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Kia | Renault |
| Model | Avella | Clio |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1322 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7150 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4650 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 3850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2850 mm |
