2000 Kia Avella vs. 2011 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2011 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Kia Avella. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Kia Avella would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 2000 Kia Avella. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2000 Kia Avella. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1081 kg more than 2000 Kia Avella. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota 4Runner (376 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Kia Avella. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Kia Avella.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Kia Avella | 2011 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Kia | Toyota |
Model | Avella | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1322 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 376 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1996 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1816 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2789 mm |