2000 Kia Avella vs. 2013 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2013 Cadillac SRX is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Kia Avella. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Kia Avella would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac SRX (304 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 2000 Kia Avella. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2000 Kia Avella. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1025 kg more than 2000 Kia Avella. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac SRX (359 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Kia Avella. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Kia Avella.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Kia Avella | 2013 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Kia | Cadillac |
Model | Avella | SRX |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1322 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 304 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 359 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4834 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2807 mm |