2000 Kia Clarus vs. 1989 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2000 Kia Clarus is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1989 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Mazda RX-7 (149 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2000 Kia Clarus. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2000 Kia Clarus.
Because 1989 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Kia Clarus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Mazda RX-7 (186 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Kia Clarus. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1989 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Kia Clarus.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Kia Clarus | 1989 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | Clarus | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 186 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2440 mm |