2000 Kia Clarus vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2000 Kia Clarus is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 600 kg more than 2000 Kia Clarus.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Kia Clarus | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Kia | Mitsubishi |
Model | Clarus | Challenger |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2730 mm |