2000 Kia Clarus vs. 2011 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2011 Nissan Cube is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Kia Clarus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Kia Clarus would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Kia Clarus (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Cube. (122 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Kia Clarus should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Cube. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Nissan Cube weights approximately 71 kg more than 2000 Kia Clarus.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Cube (172 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Kia Clarus. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan Cube will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Kia Clarus.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Kia Clarus | 2011 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Kia | Nissan |
Model | Clarus | Cube |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1301 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4001 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2530 mm |