2000 Kia Retona vs. 1956 Saab 92B
To start off, 2000 Kia Retona is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Saab 92B would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Kia Retona is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Kia Retona weights approximately 1085 kg more than 1956 Saab 92B.
Because 2000 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Saab 92B. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Kia Retona | 1956 Saab 92B | |
| Make | Kia | Saab |
| Model | Retona | 92B |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 763 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2480 mm |
