2000 Kia Retona vs. 1982 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 2000 Kia Retona is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Matra-Simca Murena (116 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2000 Kia Retona. (90 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 2000 Kia Retona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Kia Retona weights approximately 875 kg more than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena.
Because 2000 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Kia Retona | 1982 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Kia | Matra-Simca |
Model | Retona | Murena |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2156 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 116 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2440 mm |