2000 Kia Sephia II vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 Kia Sephia II is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Kia Sephia II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Kia Sephia II (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Kia Sephia II should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Kia Sephia II weights approximately 132 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Kia Sephia II (145 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 2000 Kia Sephia II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Kia Sephia II | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Kia | Nissan |
Model | Sephia II | Cedric |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 115 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1062 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2540 mm |