2000 Kia Sephia II vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2000 Kia Sephia II is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Kia Sephia II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Kia Sephia II (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Kia Sephia II should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Kia Sephia II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Kia Sephia II (145 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2000 Kia Sephia II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Kia Sephia II | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Kia | Volvo |
Model | Sephia II | 66 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.4 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1550 mm |