2000 Kia Sephia II vs. 1983 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2000 Kia Sephia II is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 365 kg more than 2000 Kia Sephia II.
Because 1983 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Kia Sephia II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Kia Sephia II | 1983 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Kia | Mercury |
Model | Sephia II | Cougar |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2650 mm |