2000 Kia Sephia II vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Kia Sephia II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Kia Sephia II would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Roadster weights approximately 183 kg more than 2000 Kia Sephia II.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Roadster (260 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Kia Sephia II. (145 Nm). This means 2013 Mini Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Kia Sephia II.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Kia Sephia II | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Kia | Mini |
Model | Sephia II | Roadster |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 260 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.4 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1062 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3734 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 50 L |