2000 Kia Shuma vs. 1956 Renault Etoile
To start off, 2000 Kia Shuma is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Renault Etoile. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Renault Etoile would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Renault Etoile is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Renault Etoile (267 HP @ 28000 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 2000 Kia Shuma. (87 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Renault Etoile should accelerate faster than 2000 Kia Shuma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Kia Shuma weights approximately 150 kg more than 1956 Renault Etoile.
Because 1956 Renault Etoile is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Renault Etoile. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Kia Shuma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Kia Shuma | 1956 Renault Etoile | |
| Make | Kia | Renault |
| Model | Shuma | Etoile |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 267 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 28000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2410 mm |
