2000 Kia Shuma vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 Kia Shuma is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Kia Shuma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Kia Shuma (87 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Kia Shuma should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Kia Shuma (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Kia Shuma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Kia Shuma | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Kia | Nissan |
Model | Shuma | Cedric |
Year Released | 2000 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2540 mm |