2000 Kia Shuma vs. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO
To start off, 2000 Kia Shuma is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi GTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi GTO would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (276 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 2000 Kia Shuma. (87 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO should accelerate faster than 2000 Kia Shuma.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Kia Shuma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (426 Nm) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Kia Shuma. (135 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Kia Shuma. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO has automatic transmission and 2000 Kia Shuma has manual transmission. 2000 Kia Shuma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Kia Shuma | 1999 Mitsubishi GTO | |
Make | Kia | Mitsubishi |
Model | Shuma | GTO |
Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 426 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2730 mm |