2000 Kia Shuma vs. 2012 Citroen C1
To start off, 2012 Citroen C1 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Kia Shuma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Kia Shuma would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Kia Shuma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Kia Shuma (87 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Kia Shuma should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Citroen C1 weights approximately 372 kg more than 2000 Kia Shuma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Kia Shuma (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 Kia Shuma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Kia Shuma | 2012 Citroen C1 | |
Make | Kia | Citroen |
Model | Shuma | C1 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1472 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2350 mm |