2000 Kia Sportage vs. 1997 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2000 Kia Sportage is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,800 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 163 kg more than 2000 Kia Sportage.
Because 2000 Kia Sportage is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Kia Sportage will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Kia Sportage | 1997 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Kia | Mercury |
| Model | Sportage | Cougar |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 126 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1457 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1860 mm |
