2000 Lada 110 vs. 1960 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2000 Lada 110 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Lada 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lada 110 (93 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lada 110 should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Seven.
Because 1960 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lada 110 | 1960 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Lada | Lotus |
Model | 110 | Seven |
Year Released | 2000 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 29 L |