2000 Lada 110 vs. 1982 Pontiac 1000
To start off, 2000 Lada 110 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Pontiac 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Pontiac 1000 would be higher. At 1,817 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Pontiac 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lada 110 (93 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1982 Pontiac 1000. (52 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lada 110 should accelerate faster than 1982 Pontiac 1000.
Because 1982 Pontiac 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Pontiac 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lada 110 (128 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Pontiac 1000. (99 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Lada 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Pontiac 1000.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lada 110 | 1982 Pontiac 1000 | |
Make | Lada | Pontiac |
Model | 110 | 1000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1817 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 99 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2400 mm |