2000 Lada 110 vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lada 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lada 110 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2000 Lada 110. (93 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 600 kg more than 2000 Lada 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada 110. (128 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada 110. 2003 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 2000 Lada 110 has manual transmission. 2000 Lada 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lada 110 | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Lada | Cadillac |
Model | 110 | CTS |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 83.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 64 L |