2000 Lada 110 vs. 2006 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lada 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lada 110 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (216 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 2000 Lada 110. (70 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada 110.
Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Lada 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (365 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada 110. (115 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lada 110 | 2006 Land Rover LR3 | |
Make | Lada | Land Rover |
Model | 110 | LR3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 4015 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 216 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 365 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 86 L |