2000 Lada 110 vs. 2006 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2006 Mazda B2300 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lada 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lada 110 would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2006 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 328 kg more than 2000 Lada 110.
Because 2006 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lada 110 | 2006 Mazda B2300 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | 110 | B2300 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2260 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1358 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2840 mm |