2000 Lada 110 vs. 2013 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2013 Cadillac SRX is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lada 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lada 110 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1410 kg more than 2000 Lada 110.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 2000 Lada 110 has manual transmission. 2000 Lada 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lada 110 | 2013 Cadillac SRX | |
| Make | Lada | Cadillac |
| Model | 110 | SRX |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1977 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 304 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 2480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4834 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1669 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2807 mm |
