2000 Lada Samara II vs. 2007 Mazda 3

To start off, 2007 Mazda 3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lada Samara II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lada Samara II would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda 3 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2000 Lada Samara II. (67 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Samara II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Mazda 3 weights approximately 288 kg more than 2000 Lada Samara II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda 3 (241 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Samara II. (110 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Samara II.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Lada Samara II 2007 Mazda 3
Make Lada Mazda
Model Samara II 3
Year Released 2000 2007
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1499 cc 1560 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 67 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 110 Nm 241 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 1750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 972 kg 1260 kg
Vehicle Length 4320 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2470 mm 2650 mm