2000 Lada Samara vs. 1956 Vauxhall Wyvern
To start off, 2000 Lada Samara is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Vauxhall Wyvern. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Vauxhall Wyvern would be higher. At 1,505 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Vauxhall Wyvern is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Vauxhall Wyvern weights approximately 40 kg more than 2000 Lada Samara.
Because 1956 Vauxhall Wyvern is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Vauxhall Wyvern. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Samara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lada Samara | 1956 Vauxhall Wyvern | |
Make | Lada | Vauxhall |
Model | Samara | Wyvern |
Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1505 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2730 mm |