2000 Lada Samara vs. 1995 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2000 Lada Samara is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Lada Samara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lada Samara (76 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1995 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lada Samara should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lada Samara weights approximately 24 kg more than 1995 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lada Samara (116 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Lada Samara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lada Samara | 1995 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Samara | Midge |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 116 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |