2000 Lada Tarzan vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre 4

To start off, 2000 Lada Tarzan is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre 4 would be higher. At 1,703 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre 4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lada Tarzan (77 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1963 Reliant Sabre 4. (70 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan should accelerate faster than 1963 Reliant Sabre 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lada Tarzan weights approximately 248 kg more than 1963 Reliant Sabre 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Lada Tarzan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Reliant Sabre 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Reliant Sabre 4 (123 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (117 Nm). This means 1963 Reliant Sabre 4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Tarzan.

Compare all specifications: