2000 Lada Tarzan vs. 1965 Triumph Spitfire

To start off, 2000 Lada Tarzan is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 1,499 cc, 2000 Lada Tarzan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lada Tarzan (77 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1965 Triumph Spitfire. (66 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph Spitfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lada Tarzan weights approximately 320 kg more than 1965 Triumph Spitfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Lada Tarzan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Triumph Spitfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lada Tarzan (117 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph Spitfire. (94 Nm). This means 2000 Lada Tarzan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph Spitfire.

Compare all specifications: