2000 Lada Tarzan vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2000 Lada Tarzan is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,499 cc, 2000 Lada Tarzan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lada Tarzan (77 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lada Tarzan weights approximately 135 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Lada Tarzan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt (120 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (117 Nm). This means 1968 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Tarzan.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lada Tarzan | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Lada | Mitsubishi |
Model | Tarzan | Colt |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 77 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 120 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 910 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2360 mm |