2000 Lada Tarzan vs. 1977 Volvo 164
To start off, 2000 Lada Tarzan is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Volvo 164 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (77 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Tarzan.
Because 2000 Lada Tarzan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Volvo 164. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Volvo 164 (204 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (117 Nm). This means 1977 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Tarzan.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lada Tarzan | 1977 Volvo 164 | |
| Make | Lada | Volvo |
| Model | Tarzan | 164 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2664 cc |
| Horse Power | 77 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 117 Nm | 204 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3350 mm |
