2000 Lada Tarzan vs. 1980 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 2000 Lada Tarzan is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 2,746 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mercedes-Benz 280 (182 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (77 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mercedes-Benz 280 should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Tarzan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mercedes-Benz 280 weights approximately 505 kg more than 2000 Lada Tarzan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Lada Tarzan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mercedes-Benz 280. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mercedes-Benz 280 (233 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (117 Nm). This means 1980 Mercedes-Benz 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Tarzan.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lada Tarzan | 1980 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
Make | Lada | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Tarzan | 280 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2746 cc |
Horse Power | 77 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 233 Nm |
Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1550 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2830 mm |