2000 Lada Tarzan vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt

To start off, 2000 Lada Tarzan is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lada Tarzan (77 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lada Tarzan weights approximately 115 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Lada Tarzan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lada Tarzan (117 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (112 Nm). This means 2000 Lada Tarzan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.

Compare all specifications: