2000 Lada Tarzan vs. 1994 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2000 Lada Tarzan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (77 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Tarzan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 35 kg more than 2000 Lada Tarzan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Lada Tarzan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Nissan Pulsar (147 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (117 Nm). This means 1994 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Tarzan.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lada Tarzan | 1994 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Lada | Nissan |
Model | Tarzan | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1594 cc |
Horse Power | 77 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 147 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1080 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2440 mm |