2000 Lada Tarzan vs. 1996 Lada Samara

To start off, 2000 Lada Tarzan is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lada Samara would be higher. At 1,499 cc, 2000 Lada Tarzan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lada Tarzan (77 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1996 Lada Samara. (64 HP @ 5550 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan should accelerate faster than 1996 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lada Tarzan weights approximately 125 kg more than 1996 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Lada Tarzan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Lada Samara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lada Tarzan (117 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lada Samara. (98 Nm). This means 2000 Lada Tarzan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lada Samara. 2000 Lada Tarzan has automatic transmission and 1996 Lada Samara has manual transmission. 1996 Lada Samara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Lada Tarzan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: