2000 Lada Tarzan vs. 1997 Mazda Sentia

To start off, 2000 Lada Tarzan is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda Sentia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda Sentia would be higher. At 2,953 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Mazda Sentia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mazda Sentia (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (77 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mazda Sentia should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Tarzan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mazda Sentia weights approximately 515 kg more than 2000 Lada Tarzan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Lada Tarzan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Mazda Sentia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mazda Sentia (245 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (117 Nm). This means 1997 Mazda Sentia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Tarzan.

Compare all specifications: