2000 Lada Tarzan vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lada Tarzan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lada Tarzan would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (77 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Tarzan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 300 kg more than 2000 Lada Tarzan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Lada Tarzan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (231 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (117 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Tarzan.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lada Tarzan | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Tarzan | 6 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1596 cc |
Horse Power | 77 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 231 Nm |
Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2630 mm |