2000 Lada Tarzan vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lada Tarzan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lada Tarzan would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS (288 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (77 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Tarzan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS weights approximately 690 kg more than 2000 Lada Tarzan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Lada Tarzan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS (365 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (117 Nm). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Tarzan.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lada Tarzan | 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Lada | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Tarzan | CLS |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 3497 cc |
Horse Power | 77 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 365 Nm |
Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1735 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2860 mm |