2000 Lada Tarzan vs. 2009 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lada Tarzan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lada Tarzan would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (77 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Tarzan.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (351 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (117 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Tarzan. 2000 Lada Tarzan has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda CX-7 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Lada Tarzan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lada Tarzan | 2009 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Tarzan | CX-7 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2261 cc |
Horse Power | 77 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 351 Nm |
Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2760 mm |