2000 Lada Tarzan vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lada Tarzan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lada Tarzan would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (77 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Tarzan.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (117 Nm). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Tarzan. 2000 Lada Tarzan has automatic transmission and 2012 Citroen C-Crosser has manual transmission. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Lada Tarzan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lada Tarzan | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Lada | Citroen |
Model | Tarzan | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2359 cc |
Horse Power | 77 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 232 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |