2000 Lada Tarzan vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lada Tarzan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lada Tarzan would be higher. At 5,461 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (518 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 441 more horse power than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (77 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Tarzan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 1300 kg more than 2000 Lada Tarzan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (699 Nm) has 582 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (117 Nm). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Tarzan.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lada Tarzan | 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | Lada | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Tarzan | ML |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 5461 cc |
| Horse Power | 77 HP | 518 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 117 Nm | 699 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 2345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2916 mm |
