2000 Lada Tarzan vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lada Tarzan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lada Tarzan would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (77 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Tarzan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 772 kg more than 2000 Lada Tarzan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Lada Tarzan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Cadillac XTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (117 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Tarzan.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lada Tarzan | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | Lada | Cadillac |
Model | Tarzan | XTS |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 3564 cc |
Horse Power | 77 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 358 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1817 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2837 mm |