2000 Lada Vaz vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lada Vaz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lada Vaz would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2000 Lada Vaz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2000 Lada Vaz. (81 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Vaz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lada Vaz weights approximately 235 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 2000 Lada Vaz is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Vaz will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (182 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Vaz. (117 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Vaz. 2000 Lada Vaz has automatic transmission and 2006 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2006 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Lada Vaz will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lada Vaz | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Vaz | 3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 182 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 810 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2650 mm |