2000 Lada Vaz vs. 2012 Mazda 3

To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lada Vaz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lada Vaz would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2000 Lada Vaz. (81 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Vaz.

Because 2000 Lada Vaz is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Vaz will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 3 (360 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Vaz. (117 Nm). This means 2012 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Vaz. 2000 Lada Vaz has automatic transmission and 2012 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2012 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Lada Vaz will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: