2000 Lamborghini Diablo vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,707 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Lamborghini Diablo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo (485 HP) has 450 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 2000 Lamborghini Diablo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lamborghini Diablo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo (633 Nm) has 552 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm). This means 2000 Lamborghini Diablo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lamborghini Diablo | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Lamborghini | Suzuki |
| Model | Diablo | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 5707 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 485 HP | 35 HP |
| Torque | 633 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2250 mm |
