2000 Lamborghini Diablo vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 5,707 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Lamborghini Diablo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo (485 HP) has 397 more horse power than 1996 Proton 300. (88 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 300.
Because 2000 Lamborghini Diablo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lamborghini Diablo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo (633 Nm) has 507 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 300. (126 Nm). This means 2000 Lamborghini Diablo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lamborghini Diablo | 1996 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Lamborghini | Proton |
| Model | Diablo | 300 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5707 cc | 1468 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 485 HP | 88 HP |
| Torque | 633 Nm | 126 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2450 mm |
