2000 Lamborghini Diablo vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lamborghini Diablo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lamborghini Diablo would be higher. At 5,992 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Lamborghini Diablo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo (543 HP @ 7100 RPM) has 311 more horse power than 2009 Mazda RX-8. (232 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2000 Lamborghini Diablo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo (621 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 405 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2000 Lamborghini Diablo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lamborghini Diablo | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Lamborghini | Mazda |
Model | Diablo | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5992 cc | 1306 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 543 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 7100 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 621 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 19.5 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 64 L |